I don't pretend to understand everything -- or even much -- of the merits of the Low Flow/No Low Flow debate. What I do know is that the federal Environmental Protection Agency can't be trusted, that the Sonoma County Water Agency (aka, the Board of Supervisors) can't be trusted and Federal Energy Regulatory Agency can't be trusted.
All too often these outfits trip all over themselves while trying (and too often succeeding) to screw us. So perhaps someone will explain to me why this story in today's Press-Democrat, Feds finalize Eel diversion cuts, makes sense.
As I read it, the EPA and its co-conspirators have decided that the three species of endangered salmon in the Eel River need more water to keep breeding, while the same suspects conclude that the same three species in the lower Russian River need less water ?
Why more water in the Eel and less water in the Russian. I'm no expert and perhaps I'm excessively cynical, but at first glance it appears that the only difference is that the Eel River water, which bypasses Lake Sonoma, can't be sold by the Water Agency to out-of-county agencies, while the Lake Sonoma water can.
Am I wrong? Click "comment" and tell me so.
Recent Comments